Analyzing #399
Analyzing #397: Variation of the parameters
Target thickness
Status: | Открыта | Start date: | 11/15/2019 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Нормальный | Due date: | |||
Assignee: | Ivan Muzalevsky | % Done: | 90% | ||
Category: | - | ||||
Target version: | - |
Description
Present the effect on the form of MM spectrum for different thicknesses of the gas in the target:
- 4 mm
- 5 mm
- 5.5 mm
- 6.5 mm
All other parameters stated in mother task are fixed.
Present the results in representation of your own choice.
History
#1 Updated by Ivan Muzalevsky about 5 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
#2 Updated by Ivan Muzalevsky almost 5 years ago
- % Done changed from 50 to 100
Values are obsolete and to be updated. Nevertheless, it is worthy to have them temporarirly to feel the force of the effect.
target thickness, mm | 9Li g.s. position 1 Tel [MeV] |
9Li g.s. position 2 Tel [MeV] |
9Li g.s. position 3 Tel [MeV] |
9Li g.s. position 4 Tel [MeV] |
4 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.59 |
5 | 0.56 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.74 |
5.5 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
6 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.88 |
6.5 | 0.78 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
#3 Updated by Vratislav Chudoba over 4 years ago
- % Done changed from 100 to 50
#4 Updated by Vratislav Chudoba over 4 years ago
- % Done changed from 50 to 90
We decided to keep the obsolete results of this task and do not update them.
The main reason is that we find out that the geometrical parameters provided by S. Krupko are sufficient enough to reconstruct the missing mass of 9Li at the expected value. Moreover, we found an approximate contribution of the target thickness to the position of the g.s. missing mass. It can be deduced from the results reported in comment 2. Such a correction is not used in our data analysis.
We let the "Done" value at 90 percent and we consider it as accomplished.